NEW DELHI: Union Interior Minister Amit Shah on friday ended Conference Opposition from the “black shirt” faction as part of political appeasement of the party, saying that the party deliberately chose the color and celebrated the second anniversary of the construction of Ram Temple to protest the restoration of the temple symbolizes the hopes. of everyone’s crores.
“Congress is communicating their opposition to temple building and the issues of ED action and price hikes are just excuses. Because they can’t afford to publicly communicate their opposition. for the temple, they tried to get the message out in a subtle way,” said Shah.
“There is no riot in the country, there is no violence and the Prime Minister has fulfilled the will of the people. The National Assembly has chosen this day to protest the construction of Ram Janmabhoomi Temple and to convey the message that they want to carry out politics. his book. concessions.”
Shah said while Congress was agitating for several days, it had never staged a colorful demonstration. “Everybody saw them protesting in casual clothes. But they chose black for Friday’s protest to signal their displeasure at the way Prime Minister Modi peacefully resolved a dispute rather than a dispute. 550 years old, associated with the people’s faith,” he said.
To prove his point that the National Assembly deliberately chose to hold the “black shirt” protest on the two-year anniversary of the foundation of the Ayodhya temple, Shah said the ED did not carry out the action. What action could be the cause of the protest of color? “No summons, no ED interrogation today, and no raids took place. So why did they choose Friday for the protests,” he said. Make a question. “Despite being in power most of the time since Independence, Congress has done nothing to resolve the dispute while Modi finds a solution to it peacefully,” Shah said, stressing that building Ram Temple is currently underway. .
Moved by the harsh remark, Jairam Ramesh, the head of the parliament’s communications branch, accused the Shah of giving a “malicious turn” to their incitement. “The Interior Secretary has made a desperate attempt to divert, distract, polarize and give a malicious twist to today’s pro-democracy protests by Congress against rising prices, unemployment. and GST. Obviously, the protests have hit the house,” he said.
The Home Secretary said Parliament’s “appeasement” politics had harmed the country without benefiting the party. “The policy of appeasement has led to the current state of Congress,” said Shah.
Shah was equally scathing about Congress’ opposition to the ED’s investigation into alleged money laundering in the National Herald case, in which Sonia Gandhi and Rahul was questioned, saying that people should respect the laws of the land.
“Congress should behave responsibly and cooperate according to the law. The case follows the complaints submitted. Congress leaders should also ensure that there is no state of law and order,” he said. said in an explicit reference to the functions Congress is seeking to defy the order ban.
Meanwhile, Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan said the fact that “black money earners” wore black was not just a coincidence on this historic day. “It was a well thought out creation for vote banking and appeasement politics,” said Pradhan.
“Congress is communicating their opposition to temple building and the issues of ED action and price hikes are just excuses. Because they can’t afford to publicly communicate their opposition. for the temple, they tried to get the message out in a subtle way,” said Shah.
“There is no riot in the country, there is no violence and the Prime Minister has fulfilled the will of the people. The National Assembly has chosen this day to protest the construction of Ram Janmabhoomi Temple and to convey the message that they want to carry out politics. his book. concessions.”
Shah said while Congress was agitating for several days, it had never staged a colorful demonstration. “Everybody saw them protesting in casual clothes. But they chose black for Friday’s protest to signal their displeasure at the way Prime Minister Modi peacefully resolved a dispute rather than a dispute. 550 years old, associated with the people’s faith,” he said.
To prove his point that the National Assembly deliberately chose to hold the “black shirt” protest on the two-year anniversary of the foundation of the Ayodhya temple, Shah said the ED did not carry out the action. What action could be the cause of the protest of color? “No summons, no ED interrogation today, and no raids took place. So why did they choose Friday for the protests,” he said. Make a question. “Despite being in power most of the time since Independence, Congress has done nothing to resolve the dispute while Modi finds a solution to it peacefully,” Shah said, stressing that building Ram Temple is currently underway. .
Moved by the harsh remark, Jairam Ramesh, the head of the parliament’s communications branch, accused the Shah of giving a “malicious turn” to their incitement. “The Interior Secretary has made a desperate attempt to divert, distract, polarize and give a malicious twist to today’s pro-democracy protests by Congress against rising prices, unemployment. and GST. Obviously, the protests have hit the house,” he said.
The Home Secretary said Parliament’s “appeasement” politics had harmed the country without benefiting the party. “The policy of appeasement has led to the current state of Congress,” said Shah.
Shah was equally scathing about Congress’ opposition to the ED’s investigation into alleged money laundering in the National Herald case, in which Sonia Gandhi and Rahul was questioned, saying that people should respect the laws of the land.
“Congress should behave responsibly and cooperate according to the law. The case follows the complaints submitted. Congress leaders should also ensure that there is no state of law and order,” he said. said in an explicit reference to the functions Congress is seeking to defy the order ban.
Meanwhile, Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan said the fact that “black money earners” wore black was not just a coincidence on this historic day. “It was a well thought out creation for vote banking and appeasement politics,” said Pradhan.
