This is an editorial opinion of Vinicius Piscinia bitcoin prize.
Despite the great growth potential of countries in Latin America, such as Brazil, Argentina, Chile and even Paraguay, external influences contribute to their stagnation and purported economic decline. We can assert that the international protectionism that potential would provide in normal times of fair competition has been curtailed by the manipulation of great powers, notably the United States and China. ..
Some players are interested in making their influence in developing countries. The US financial system, characterized by the hegemony of the dollar in international reserves and the concordance of US monetary policy with respect to other countries, ensures that the US is in a position to inaccessible in the diplomatic sphere. Bitcoin can be a disaster for this, thanks to its decentralized system and more importantly, the fact that it has no controlling authority (not even a known founder), which makes for unfair competition is not possible.
When we analyze China’s intervention tactics, we observe predatory lending by which China has completely dominated countries such as Maldives and Sri Lanka. This is happening now in many South American countries also. There is also the direct creation of military bases, such as at Paraje Quintuco in the province of Neuquén in Argentina built under the guise of a space station. Apart from this, we see a big impact China’s system works across the continent in the form of policies adopted there tried in China – something that was very clear after the control measures were taken under the pretext of COVID-19.
The United States has a clearer and more prominent influence – especially in economic and demographic terms – over some South American countries, such as Brazil and Colombia. It is worth recognizing that the United States is not only an economic power, but also an institutional power. The country’s dominant political class has more power to manipulate international law, whether through the United Nations, or even through bilateral agreements or joint action. A good example is the Paris Agreement, of which the United States is currently the main promoter.
Henry Kissinger, Great American Architect of International Influence
Kissinger was not only responsible for the economic development of China, which has been ongoing since the 1970s as a result of the financing motivated by his policies, but he is also responsible for an American foreign policy aimed at the economic decline of developing nations. develop in different ways. This is mainly achieved with emphasis on population reduction and establishment non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.
Things have slipped past authorities in most developing countries as a mere diplomatic compromise, as well as an opportunity to capitalize on the promise the US government has promised. In that way, control of the international monetary system is crucial to the implementation of such measures, not only to put pressure on those who do not comply, but also to pass subsidies on to those who commit. best.
In a document called “Kissinger’s report” pregnancy and abortion in the U.S. Agency for International Development program. He also called for increased advertising that promotes the desire to not breed and controls the price of a variety of inputs that are necessary for the desired rate of reproduction and are important for long-term economic development. .
The de-industrialization of the southern hemisphere has always been the wish of the great Anglo-Saxon empires after the 18th century, once under the tutelage of Great Britain and now with America at the center. As a way to ensure the permanence of the project, another policy explicitly advocated by Kissinger not only, but across all global institutions, is nuclear non-proliferation, which leads to an imbalance of nuclear weapons. by diplomacy at the negotiating table between a number of developed countries. in the Northern Hemisphere and developing countries in the Southern Hemisphere.
Obviously, once dollar weakness becomes more and more evident, it will weaken the enforceability of such destructive measures, as control of the financial system is imperative for the implementation of such measures. show them. Bitcoin, as a currency that cannot be counterfeited by any government or private entity, will be crucial in ensuring that outside forces will not copy competing methods. This unhealthy and subversive control.
This is a guest post Vinicius Piscini. The opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BTC Inc. or Bitcoin Magazine.